CONFIGURATION!

scripts/kconfig/tests/new_choice_with_dep/Kconfig

@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+config A
+	bool "A"
+	help
+	  This is a new symbol.
+
+choice
+	prompt "Choice ?"
+	depends on A
+	help
+	  "depends on A" has been newly added.
+
+config CHOICE_B
+	bool "Choice B"
+
+config CHOICE_C
+	bool "Choice C"
+	help
+	  This is a new symbol, so should be asked.
+
+endchoice
+
+choice
+	prompt "Choice2 ?"
+
+config CHOICE_D
+	bool "Choice D"
+
+config CHOICE_E
+	bool "Choice E"
+
+config CHOICE_F
+	bool "Choice F"
+	depends on A
+	help
+	  This is a new symbol, so should be asked.
+
+endchoice

scripts/kconfig/tests/new_choice_with_dep/__init__.py

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+"""
+Ask new choice values when they become visible.
+
+If new choice values are added with new dependency, and they become
+visible during user configuration, oldconfig should recognize them
+as (NEW), and ask the user for choice.
+
+Related Linux commit: 5d09598d488f081e3be23f885ed65cbbe2d073b5
+"""
+
+
+def test(conf):
+    assert conf.oldconfig('config', 'y') == 0
+    assert conf.stdout_contains('expected_stdout')

scripts/kconfig/tests/new_choice_with_dep/config

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+CONFIG_CHOICE_B=y
+# CONFIG_CHOICE_D is not set
+CONFIG_CHOICE_E=y

scripts/kconfig/tests/new_choice_with_dep/expected_stdout

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+A (A) [N/y/?] (NEW) y
+  Choice ?
+  > 1. Choice B (CHOICE_B)
+    2. Choice C (CHOICE_C) (NEW)
+  choice[1-2?]: 
+Choice2 ?
+  1. Choice D (CHOICE_D)
+> 2. Choice E (CHOICE_E)
+  3. Choice F (CHOICE_F) (NEW)
+choice[1-3?]: